Management Information Systems Project Research Paper

Management Information Systems Project - Research Paper ExampleThe dot.com bubble was a cycle that emerged in form of nuttiness. Although the dot.com bubble was a new bust, it was not the first bubble to come up. This is because there was the compact disc read- only if memory bubble that was in existence. This CD-ROM bubble was from the companies interchangeable the bill gates company by the name information at your fingertips. This company was among the companies that were the watchword of the world. Another example of a company that was with the CD-ROM bubble is the Microsoft home (Preissl, Bouwman & Steinfield, 2004). The chief reason for the up sexual climax of the dot.com was to offer an e- commerce service to the computer net users. The bubble was basically for the marketing in the internet to the potential client. The dot.com bubble aimed at increasing the internet stock market for specific companies which were calling themselves the dot.com. The NASDAQ was at the highest le vel of its stock marketing records during the dot.com bubble. Subsequently, NASDAQ is the dominant and astray known for the market capitalization. For instance, the NASDAQ in the year of 2000 was able to make up to about 5048.62 peak value, which was double the previous years amount which was almost 2500. This was consequently termed the2000 burst as the cataclysmic. The chief examples of the big busts that were capable of buying these bubbles included the Microsoft Company, the dell, and besides the Intel Company. Additionally, the Cisco Company, the oracles and also the sun Microsystems Company. These companies were competent of venturing into this business by funding the bubble. For instance, a sum of approximately 600 US Dollars was put for utilization in the starting up of the wed 2.0. Unfortunately, this funding did not lead to the succeeding success of the bubble. Thus it was a loss to the companies that put their money into the venture. Moreover, these companies that wer e dealing with the internet business were known by the name of the four horsemen of the NASDAQ. this was chiefly collectible to their significance in the contribution of the capitalization in the business industry (Preissl, Bouwman & Steinfield, 2004). Unfortunately, the NASDAQ lost a huge sum of cash during the funding of the web 2.0 and also the dot.com. This is because the NASDAQ businesses thought that they were going to get a higher amount of revenue from the investments in this bubble. The chief significant acquisitions market is the sole vital and further the only feasible supply of the potential startup of this bubble. Though there has been a significantly large and further potential high profile of the web 2.0 acquirement, the investors constitute subsequently been reducing their potential expectations since the time of 1998 (Argenti & Barnes, 2009). Evidently, the price of these companies that was capable of acquiring was large during the first year of the funding. Unfor tunately the amount began to reduce for the next coming financial years, thus leading these companies into a financial loss (Preissl, Bouwman & Steinfield, 2004). We learn from the dot.com bubble that when making long-term investments, we should do it when prices are not overvalued as intimately as when fundamentals are good, especially when it comes to stock market. This is because the market is bound to clash due to overvaluing of prices as well as due to poor fundamentals. In case of short-term investments, one should trade and upon getting the profit, move out. Last, one should be skeptical when a company is promising to make life-altering