Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone: From Book to Film Essay

molest Potter and the Sorcerers orchestra pit was the first of seven mass series by J. K. Rowling first create on July 1997. It is about the accident of an eleven-year-old boy who grew up with his aunt and uncle and after discovers that he performs from a family of witches and adepts. The direct adaptation of the reserve was released in 2001 by Warner Bros. , and, like both admit adaptation, has had its share of praises and criticisms. Some held that the shoot down had been flock to the book, scarcely of course, just like in any different demand adaptation, thither will al charges be some alterations from the book from which film adaptations were based.Some of the criticisms of the film adaptation of the first blight Potter series accept the director, Chris Columbus, being too slavish a devotion to the book and too microscopical of his own creative input (Silvain). Corliss criticized that Columbus is national to make a students copy of the original get rise up portrait. He held that the rile Potter film has loads of technical expertness but lacks the enthralling life of Rowlings original. Indeed, the film adaptation had just altered the story from the book.Nevertheless, there were alterations and the film still falls short-circuit from the wizardly experience enjoyed by the readers. in that respect are some humble inconsistencys in the films depiction of characters. As an example, Hagrid, who was described in the book as being al nearly twice as large as a normal man and at least five-spot times as wide (Rowling, 14), although depicted in the film as much taller to be almost twice as tall than any man, was non five times as wide. These differences, however, are almost negligible because of the other characters brilliant depiction in the film.Read more arrive of words in the harry potter series.The depictions of Hogwarts professors were perfect Dumbledores longsighted silvery hair and beard marked him unmistakably the wisest, if not the strongest, wizard in the story prof McGonnagals commanding presence and professor Snapes intimidating presence were brilliantly role vie by the actors. The other characters depictions were superb, most especially the Dursleys, the Weasleys, Hermione and Malfoy. get tos Scotch-tape bound eyeglasses could too not be missed out. When it comes to the storyline, the film has altered a clutch from the book without losing the overall content.For starters, the film did not begin with the Dursleys, not with their unemotionality to witches and wizards, and most especially not with Uncle Vernons experiences, unwittingly of magic, on his way to removeice and back home, as was first fork outed in the book. Hagrid did not evoke in the film that he borrowed the motorcycle from Sirius Black, who Rowling foreshadowed in the book as we choose from a later series that Sirius is raises godfather. alike in the book, when Dumbledore left baby Potter in the Dursleys doorstep, he le ft the letter with chivvy clutching it, not beside plague as personateed in the film.As gravel is growing up, the film lacks introduction on how the Dursleys, most especially Dudley, mistreat harass. There was no mention of Mrs. Figgs neither Piers nor hinder high from where Harry would be studying if he had not legitimate the letter from Hogwarts was mentioned in the film. In the film, when Harry received his first letter from Hogwarts, it was Dudley who snatched it away from him, while in the book it was Uncle Vernon, and while the film showed that win letters from Hogwarts to Harry was being burned or shredded into pieces, there was no origination of Harry moving from under the stairs to a room next to Dudleys.When Hagrid finally brought Harry the Hogwarts letter in the little shack atop a rock in the middle of the sea on Harrrys birthday, the confrontation between Hagrid and Uncle Vernon lacked the intensity that was presented in the book. Explanations of Hagrid to Har ry about Hogwarts and his parents is too lacking in lucubrate in the film. Moreover, Hagrid and Harry did not left in the middle of the shadow during a drive in the books version of the story. Events in Diagon Alley presented in the film also lack faithfulness from the book.The twisting trail to the vaults in Gringotts was omitted as well as Hagrids reaction to this. The cyclorama in Madam Malkins shop where Harry met a boy, who we later learn to be Draco Malfoy, for the first time was also omitted. This is also where Harry was supposed to hear about Quidditch based on the book, as well as the different Hogwart houses and differences of witch and wizard lineages, which Hagrid later on explained to Harry. Hagrid did not leave Harry alone when he purchased his first wand it was in Madam Malkins shop that Hagrid had left Harry to recompose himself from their trip with the Gringotts vaults.At Ollivanders, Harry tried many wands, more than three contrary what was depicted in the f ilm, sooner the man attending him had finally name the regenerate wand for Harry. Furthermore, Harry did not make the least indicant of a spell in trying the wands prior to finding the right one as the man attending him had stopped Harry before he can wave the wands. The film also did not include Uncle Vernon being asked by Harry and actually dropping Harry off to the train station.It was in Hogwarts express that Harry and Malfoy had their first confrontation where Malfoy certain Harry not to go making friends with the wrong sort and Harry replying that he can tell who the wrong sort are by himself, in contrast with the film where this scene was presented after the first days entered Hogwarts through an underground passage by the lake. There was no strain from the sorting hat, nor were there any Hogwarts song in the film. The events following Holloween night was presented in the film not exactly as it was described in the book.Norbert, the Norwegian Ridgeback baby dragon that Hagrid raised, was not sent to Romania by the Ministry of Magic, but was sent there through Charlies friends. Harry and Hermiones fortuity of smuggling Norbert out of Hogwarts was never mentioned in the film. Harry, Hermione, Malfoy, and Nevilles detention in the forbidden forest also differed from how it was described in the book. The film skipped Harry being grouped with Hagrid and Hermione first before Hagrid decided that he should come with Malfoy and Fang as Harry is much braver than Neville and could stand up to Malfoys bullying.Harry has also met three centaurs, even riding on the back of one. maybe the most noticeable difference between the films presentation and the books story could be found during Harry, Ron and Hermiones adventure going after the sorcerers stone. In chapter 16 of the book, Harry played the flute given to him by Hagrid as a Christmas present to make Fluffy fall asleep and had no anaesthetize get past him. After going through the trapdoor, both Harry and Ron were having trouble with the Devils Snare and Hermione had to use the spell she had with Snape on Harrys first Quidditch match to free them.Then, all three went to develop the right key, each taking a broomstick, at the end of the passageway. The escape keys did not attack but were moving so fast that it was tight to catch them. On the giant chess board, Harry, Ron and Hermione had to replace chess pieces to play the game, not Ron riding the knights horse. Furthermore, there was no feature in the book that the giant chess pieces were smashed into destruction. There were also no sing of any troll in a bedchamber after getting past the giant chess game.Finally, Harry and Hermione had to operate a puzzle set up by Professor Snape as the last obstacle to enter the chamber where the Mirror of Erised had been moved to. This scene is totally missing from the film. The climax of the story, Harrys confrontation with Professor Quirrel and Voldemort, had been faithful to the book , although in the book, Harry had not destroyed Professor Quirrel in the end of their confrontation. The films depiction of Voldemorts face at the back of Professor Quirrels head was also slightly differed from the books description.The book described it as chalk white with apparent red eyes and slits for nostrils, like a snake (Rowling, 293). Voldemorts wander as depicted in the film was not very snakelike. There are a few more difference between the film and the books story the film had not depicted Harry not being afraid of mentioning Voldemorts name Harry had played in two Quidditch matches in the book Peeves antics were missing in the film and Dumbledore did not explain Professor Snape and James Potters, Harrys father, history. Simply put, the film does not have the detailed events presented in the book.It has chaotic the events as it happened in the book while still able to present roughly the same story. However, for the Harry Potter fanatic, the most frustrating differenc e between the film and the book was the films lack of magical experience. For a film based on a magical imagine book series, Harry Potter and the Sorcerers Stone film, ironically, had not been magical, missing out on some important details and suspense. On the other hand, the film tried to be as faithful to Rowlings story. Even with omissions and alterations, the film basically presented the same story as Rowlings.It, however, lacked the details that Rowling had included in the book. Given the limitations of technology in computer graphics and animation, the film has brought Hogwarts to life, but could never match up to the experience that course session the book had. As a final note, while the film had a total gross of approximately $970 billion, it has surprisingly not met the expectation of fanatics and readers worldwide with its lack of magic and omissions of some scenes that were somehow important to the overall presentation of the story.